https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189185 For service matters concerning travelling allowance, discipline, control, classification, appeal, conduct, probation and departmental promotion, previous approval under Section 115(7) of the States Reorganisation Act was not required. The Central Government's clarification of 11 May 1957 and the earlier ruling in Raghavendra Rao were treated as settling that position, and the High Court's contrary observations on the validity of the rules were not good law. The result was that the challenged reversion-related order remained undisturbed. en-us Fri, 13 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Dec 2016 17:26:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189185 For service matters concerning travelling allowance, discipline, control, classification, appeal, conduct, probation and departmental promotion, previous approval under Section 115(7) of the States Reorganisation Act was not required. The Central Government's clarification of 11 May 1957 and the earlier ruling in Raghavendra Rao were treated as settling that position, and the High Court's contrary observations on the validity of the rules were not good law. The result was that the challenged reversion-related order remained undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189185