<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1539 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336894</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, holding that the Principal CIT&#039;s order under Section 263 was not justified as the assessee&#039;s weighted deduction claim under Section 35(2AB) was valid and allowable. The Tribunal emphasized that the AO had correctly accepted the claim after due verification, and the absence of Form 3CL did not invalidate the deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2016 17:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1539 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336894</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, holding that the Principal CIT&#039;s order under Section 263 was not justified as the assessee&#039;s weighted deduction claim under Section 35(2AB) was valid and allowable. The Tribunal emphasized that the AO had correctly accepted the claim after due verification, and the absence of Form 3CL did not invalidate the deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336894</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>