<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1533 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336888</link>
    <description>The court quashed the tribunal&#039;s order requiring payment on exempted goods under Rule 6(3)(b) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002, as it relied on a decision later overturned. The respondent was allowed to apply within one month with supporting documents for benefits under the amended rule, directing consideration in line with the law and merits. The appeal was allowed partially, with no cost order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2018 17:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1533 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336888</link>
      <description>The court quashed the tribunal&#039;s order requiring payment on exempted goods under Rule 6(3)(b) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002, as it relied on a decision later overturned. The respondent was allowed to apply within one month with supporting documents for benefits under the amended rule, directing consideration in line with the law and merits. The appeal was allowed partially, with no cost order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>