<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1529 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336884</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI remanded the case concerning service tax liability on Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency services back to the Adjudicating Authority for reevaluation. The Tribunal found that the agreement provided did not sufficiently clarify the services rendered, necessitating a fresh consideration. The original order was set aside, emphasizing the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice. The appellant was directed to respond to the show-cause notice and submit relevant documents for review within four weeks. The Tribunal did not delve into the merits but stressed the need for a fair reassessment based on evidence and procedural compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2016 15:17:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1529 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336884</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI remanded the case concerning service tax liability on Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency services back to the Adjudicating Authority for reevaluation. The Tribunal found that the agreement provided did not sufficiently clarify the services rendered, necessitating a fresh consideration. The original order was set aside, emphasizing the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice. The appellant was directed to respond to the show-cause notice and submit relevant documents for review within four weeks. The Tribunal did not delve into the merits but stressed the need for a fair reassessment based on evidence and procedural compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336884</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>