https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336874 The appellants defaulted in monthly excise duty payments, leading to demands for duty paid during the default period, penalties under Rule 25, and interest under Section 11AB. The appellants paid duty monthly from their Cenvat account, which was accepted by the department. The adjudicating authority confirmed duty demand and penalties. The appeals sought penalty waivers, with penalties reduced from the duty amount to Rs. 1 lakh each. The Member (Judicial) found no duty evasion intent, reducing penalties under Rule 27 to Rs. 5,000 each, modifying the order and partly allowing the appeals. en-us Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Feb 2018 10:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336874 The appellants defaulted in monthly excise duty payments, leading to demands for duty paid during the default period, penalties under Rule 25, and interest under Section 11AB. The appellants paid duty monthly from their Cenvat account, which was accepted by the department. The adjudicating authority confirmed duty demand and penalties. The appeals sought penalty waivers, with penalties reduced from the duty amount to Rs. 1 lakh each. The Member (Judicial) found no duty evasion intent, reducing penalties under Rule 27 to Rs. 5,000 each, modifying the order and partly allowing the appeals. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336874