https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336870 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision, ruling that the respondent was not liable for a penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules as there was no evidence of intentional evasion or suppression of facts to justify penalties. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed as the show-cause notice did not allege any fraudulent activities. en-us Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Dec 2016 18:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336870 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision, ruling that the respondent was not liable for a penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules as there was no evidence of intentional evasion or suppression of facts to justify penalties. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed as the show-cause notice did not allege any fraudulent activities. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336870