<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1500 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336855</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the lower authority&#039;s decision to reject the declared value of imported goods, emphasizing the importance of considering contemporaneous imports and comparing them with goods imported by another entity. The tribunal found that the valuation was correctly determined under the Customs Valuation Rules, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 13:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453518" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1500 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336855</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the lower authority&#039;s decision to reject the declared value of imported goods, emphasizing the importance of considering contemporaneous imports and comparing them with goods imported by another entity. The tribunal found that the valuation was correctly determined under the Customs Valuation Rules, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>