<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1629 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189175</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay admitted an appeal concerning the justification of upholding demand for an extended period without deliberate withholding of information to evade Service Tax and the imposition of penalties under sections 78 and 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. The respondent waived service.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2016 12:33:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1629 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189175</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay admitted an appeal concerning the justification of upholding demand for an extended period without deliberate withholding of information to evade Service Tax and the imposition of penalties under sections 78 and 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. The respondent waived service.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189175</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>