<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1199 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189176</link>
    <description>Transfer pricing adjustment under Chapter X is confined to the international transactions with associated enterprises, not the assessee&#039;s dealings with non-associated enterprises. The Court treated that limitation as settled by binding precedent and rejected the Revenue&#039;s objection that the accounts could not be bifurcated. It also held that the challenge to the Tribunal&#039;s direction did not give rise to any substantial question of law, so the adjustment remained restricted to the AE segment alone.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2016 12:33:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1199 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189176</link>
      <description>Transfer pricing adjustment under Chapter X is confined to the international transactions with associated enterprises, not the assessee&#039;s dealings with non-associated enterprises. The Court treated that limitation as settled by binding precedent and rejected the Revenue&#039;s objection that the accounts could not be bifurcated. It also held that the challenge to the Tribunal&#039;s direction did not give rise to any substantial question of law, so the adjustment remained restricted to the AE segment alone.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>