<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1170 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189178</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed for being filed beyond the 90-day limit from the receipt of the Order-in-Original. The delay in filing the appeal exceeded the permissible limit for condonation under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal concurred with the findings that the delay was beyond the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; power to condone. As a result, both the appeal and the Stay Petition were dismissed by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2016 12:33:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1170 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189178</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed for being filed beyond the 90-day limit from the receipt of the Order-in-Original. The delay in filing the appeal exceeded the permissible limit for condonation under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal concurred with the findings that the delay was beyond the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; power to condone. As a result, both the appeal and the Stay Petition were dismissed by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>