<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 1112 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189180</link>
    <description>Service tax liability on works contracts for civil construction depended on the statutory regime in force during the relevant period of execution. The 1 June 2007 introduction of service tax for certain works contracts applied to contracts completed after that date, while contracts finished before then were not taxable merely because payment was received later. Contracts awarded before 1 June 2007 but extending beyond that date, or awarded thereafter, had to be tested against the applicable law at the stage of execution. The later insertion of Section 65B(54) in 2012 did not displace the earlier taxable category already covered by the 2007 amendment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2016 12:33:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 1112 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189180</link>
      <description>Service tax liability on works contracts for civil construction depended on the statutory regime in force during the relevant period of execution. The 1 June 2007 introduction of service tax for certain works contracts applied to contracts completed after that date, while contracts finished before then were not taxable merely because payment was received later. Contracts awarded before 1 June 2007 but extending beyond that date, or awarded thereafter, had to be tested against the applicable law at the stage of execution. The later insertion of Section 65B(54) in 2012 did not displace the earlier taxable category already covered by the 2007 amendment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>