<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1495 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336850</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the petitions filed by the Petitioner under Section 163 of the Companies Act, 1956, ruling that he was not entitled to the requested documents and imposed costs for frivolous litigation. The Tribunal affirmed its jurisdiction, noted the Respondents&#039; compliance with statutory obligations, and highlighted the Petitioner&#039;s history of vexatious litigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2016 12:23:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1495 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336850</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the petitions filed by the Petitioner under Section 163 of the Companies Act, 1956, ruling that he was not entitled to the requested documents and imposed costs for frivolous litigation. The Tribunal affirmed its jurisdiction, noted the Respondents&#039; compliance with statutory obligations, and highlighted the Petitioner&#039;s history of vexatious litigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>