<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (4) TMI 327 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189166</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Judicial Commissioner&#039;s decision and restoring the trial Judge&#039;s order in a case concerning the abatement of a suit due to the death of the defendant. The Court clarified the interpretation of &quot;legal representative&quot; under the Civil Procedure Code, emphasizing the inclusive nature of the term. The Court held that bringing some heirs on record at a subsequent stage did not invalidate the proceedings, especially when the widow, as a legal representative, was timely included. The Court directed prompt resolution of the suit and awarded costs to the appellant Bank.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:32:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453480" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (4) TMI 327 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189166</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Judicial Commissioner&#039;s decision and restoring the trial Judge&#039;s order in a case concerning the abatement of a suit due to the death of the defendant. The Court clarified the interpretation of &quot;legal representative&quot; under the Civil Procedure Code, emphasizing the inclusive nature of the term. The Court held that bringing some heirs on record at a subsequent stage did not invalidate the proceedings, especially when the widow, as a legal representative, was timely included. The Court directed prompt resolution of the suit and awarded costs to the appellant Bank.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>