https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189165 A claim to resist specific allotment in partition on the footing of constructions raised on the property failed because the works were made with notice of the respondent's title claim and without bona fide equity; the respondent's right to partition and specific allotment was upheld. On abatement, the appeal did not fail merely because all legal representatives of the deceased respondent were not initially impleaded, since bringing on record those known after diligent enquiry was sufficient to represent the estate in the absence of fraud or collusion. The preliminary objection as to abatement was rejected. en-us Tue, 08 Sep 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:21:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189165 A claim to resist specific allotment in partition on the footing of constructions raised on the property failed because the works were made with notice of the respondent's title claim and without bona fide equity; the respondent's right to partition and specific allotment was upheld. On abatement, the appeal did not fail merely because all legal representatives of the deceased respondent were not initially impleaded, since bringing on record those known after diligent enquiry was sufficient to represent the estate in the absence of fraud or collusion. The preliminary objection as to abatement was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 08 Sep 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189165