https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189165 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decree granting specific possession of her third share in the property to the respondent. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing that the appellant could not claim equity based on wrongful acts. The procedural issue of abatement was addressed, ruling that the appeal did not abate due to diligent efforts to bring legal representatives on record. en-us Tue, 08 Sep 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:21:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189165 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decree granting specific possession of her third share in the property to the respondent. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing that the appellant could not claim equity based on wrongful acts. The procedural issue of abatement was addressed, ruling that the appeal did not abate due to diligent efforts to bring legal representatives on record. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 08 Sep 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189165