https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189161 The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order and directed the respondents to deposit 50% of the license fee and file an undertaking to pay the remaining 50% if their writ petition is dismissed. This arrangement aimed to balance the equities, protecting the State's revenue interests while not imposing an undue burden on the licensee. The Court also mandated that any amount paid could be adjusted or refunded with interest if the respondents succeeded in their challenge. en-us Mon, 01 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Dec 2016 17:14:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189161 The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order and directed the respondents to deposit 50% of the license fee and file an undertaking to pay the remaining 50% if their writ petition is dismissed. This arrangement aimed to balance the equities, protecting the State's revenue interests while not imposing an undue burden on the licensee. The Court also mandated that any amount paid could be adjusted or refunded with interest if the respondents succeeded in their challenge. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 01 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189161