<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 796 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189160</link>
    <description>The reassessment proceedings initiated under section 148 were deemed invalid as they were solely based on an audit objection without independent assessment by the Assessing Officer. The rejection of books of account under section 145(3) was upheld due to significant discrepancies. The application of a net profit rate was adjusted by the CIT(A) based on the assessee&#039;s historical performance. The disallowance under section 40a(ia) was deleted after the rejection of books. The treatment of bank interest income was remanded for further review. The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and cross objection, while partially allowing the department&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 17:11:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 796 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189160</link>
      <description>The reassessment proceedings initiated under section 148 were deemed invalid as they were solely based on an audit objection without independent assessment by the Assessing Officer. The rejection of books of account under section 145(3) was upheld due to significant discrepancies. The application of a net profit rate was adjusted by the CIT(A) based on the assessee&#039;s historical performance. The disallowance under section 40a(ia) was deleted after the rejection of books. The treatment of bank interest income was remanded for further review. The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and cross objection, while partially allowing the department&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189160</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>