<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1707 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189149</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. Grounds 1 to 5 were allowed as payments were not considered royalty under the Income-tax Act or DTAA. Grounds 6 to 11 became irrelevant due to non-taxability findings. Ground 12 was allowed for statistical purposes, directing verification of the tax credit claimed by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2023 16:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1707 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189149</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. Grounds 1 to 5 were allowed as payments were not considered royalty under the Income-tax Act or DTAA. Grounds 6 to 11 became irrelevant due to non-taxability findings. Ground 12 was allowed for statistical purposes, directing verification of the tax credit claimed by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189149</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>