<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Sections 36 and 43-B of Income Tax Act Not Mutually Exclusive for Provident Fund, ESI Deductions.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=32603</link>
    <description>Whether the provisions of Section 36 and Section 43-B are mutually exclusive and the Assessee is legally entitled to claim deduction of employees&#039; contribution to provident fund and ESI u/s 43-B as amended vide FA, 2003, even if the said deduction was not admissible u/s 36(1)(va) - Held Yes - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 13:07:09 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 13:07:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453429" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Sections 36 and 43-B of Income Tax Act Not Mutually Exclusive for Provident Fund, ESI Deductions.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=32603</link>
      <description>Whether the provisions of Section 36 and Section 43-B are mutually exclusive and the Assessee is legally entitled to claim deduction of employees&#039; contribution to provident fund and ESI u/s 43-B as amended vide FA, 2003, even if the said deduction was not admissible u/s 36(1)(va) - Held Yes - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 13:07:09 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=32603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>