<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (8) TMI 7 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6259</link>
    <description>For valuation of a business under section 7(2) of the Wealth-tax Act, the balance-sheet is relevant but not conclusive: the Wealth-tax Officer may rely on the asset values shown while rejecting an impermissible deduction even if it appears in the accounts. Service lines and service connections built at consumers&#039; expense were nevertheless treated as the assessee&#039;s assets because ownership on the valuation date, not the source of funds, governed inclusion in net wealth. The Electricity Act&#039;s treatment of those lines for compulsory sale price did not alter their wealth-tax character. The valuation was therefore upheld against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 18:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (8) TMI 7 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6259</link>
      <description>For valuation of a business under section 7(2) of the Wealth-tax Act, the balance-sheet is relevant but not conclusive: the Wealth-tax Officer may rely on the asset values shown while rejecting an impermissible deduction even if it appears in the accounts. Service lines and service connections built at consumers&#039; expense were nevertheless treated as the assessee&#039;s assets because ownership on the valuation date, not the source of funds, governed inclusion in net wealth. The Electricity Act&#039;s treatment of those lines for compulsory sale price did not alter their wealth-tax character. The valuation was therefore upheld against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>