<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1475 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336830</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the assessee is not eligible for exemption under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) due to its banking-like activities with non-members, falling under Section 80P(4). Treatment of overdue interest on sticky loans was allowed in favor of the assessee. Verification and decision on NPAs were directed to be conducted by the A.O. The statutory reserve issue was dismissed. The appeals were partly allowed, and cross-objections were dismissed as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2016 11:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1475 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336830</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the assessee is not eligible for exemption under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) due to its banking-like activities with non-members, falling under Section 80P(4). Treatment of overdue interest on sticky loans was allowed in favor of the assessee. Verification and decision on NPAs were directed to be conducted by the A.O. The statutory reserve issue was dismissed. The appeals were partly allowed, and cross-objections were dismissed as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>