https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336823 Cenvat credit on cables was held admissible where the cables were used in providing output service, and credit could not be denied merely because they did not qualify as capital goods; the same item could still be treated as input if the scheme requirements were otherwise satisfied. The dispute on input service credit was remanded because the supporting documents produced by the appellant had not been properly examined, and entitlement depended on verification of those records before a fresh order was passed. en-us Tue, 13 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Aug 2017 14:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336823 Cenvat credit on cables was held admissible where the cables were used in providing output service, and credit could not be denied merely because they did not qualify as capital goods; the same item could still be treated as input if the scheme requirements were otherwise satisfied. The dispute on input service credit was remanded because the supporting documents produced by the appellant had not been properly examined, and entitlement depended on verification of those records before a fresh order was passed. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 13 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336823