<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1466 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336821</link>
    <description>The appeal by M/s Shryas Intermediates Ltd. regarding the penalty under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 was disposed of. The court decided not to uphold the penalty under Section 78 due to a revenue-neutral situation. However, the penalty under Section 77 was maintained for the appellant&#039;s failure to disclose transportation value in their returns.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 12:20:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1466 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336821</link>
      <description>The appeal by M/s Shryas Intermediates Ltd. regarding the penalty under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 was disposed of. The court decided not to uphold the penalty under Section 78 due to a revenue-neutral situation. However, the penalty under Section 77 was maintained for the appellant&#039;s failure to disclose transportation value in their returns.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>