<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1458 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336813</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that inspection charges should not be included in the assessable value for duty calculation under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. They found that the charges were not directly related to the sale of goods and were reimbursed by the customer, thus should not form part of the transaction value. Citing various judgments, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the decision dropping the duty demand on inspection charges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 17:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1458 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336813</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that inspection charges should not be included in the assessable value for duty calculation under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. They found that the charges were not directly related to the sale of goods and were reimbursed by the customer, thus should not form part of the transaction value. Citing various judgments, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the decision dropping the duty demand on inspection charges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>