https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336804 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeals regarding refund claims under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal held that all services for which the Commissioner (A) had rejected the refund were deemed as input services with a direct nexus to the output service. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and directed the refund for eligible services after verification by the original authority. The appeals were allowed based on the recognition of the disputed services as falling within the definition of input services. en-us Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Dec 2016 11:42:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336804 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeals regarding refund claims under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal held that all services for which the Commissioner (A) had rejected the refund were deemed as input services with a direct nexus to the output service. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and directed the refund for eligible services after verification by the original authority. The appeals were allowed based on the recognition of the disputed services as falling within the definition of input services. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336804