https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189143 Regulatory teleprinter instructions and an amended stock-limit order were treated as executive measures aimed at controlling essential commodities, preventing hoarding and black-marketing, and ensuring equitable distribution at fair prices. The measures were described as having a rational nexus with public distribution and price support, and as imposing reasonable restrictions consistent with Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 301. On the seizure challenge, the text notes that relief under Article 32 was inappropriate because the dispute turned on contested facts about the source and movement of the wheat, which were already before the statutory confiscation authority under Section 6A of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. en-us Thu, 05 Nov 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Dec 2016 10:51:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189143 Regulatory teleprinter instructions and an amended stock-limit order were treated as executive measures aimed at controlling essential commodities, preventing hoarding and black-marketing, and ensuring equitable distribution at fair prices. The measures were described as having a rational nexus with public distribution and price support, and as imposing reasonable restrictions consistent with Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 301. On the seizure challenge, the text notes that relief under Article 32 was inappropriate because the dispute turned on contested facts about the source and movement of the wheat, which were already before the statutory confiscation authority under Section 6A of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 05 Nov 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189143