<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1777 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189124</link>
    <description>A statutory corporation engaged in liquor trading remained taxable on income accrued in its own hands because the amounts described as privilege fee, special privilege fee and special privilege fee for sports were realised from sales and remitted only afterwards to the Government. The absence of a clear statutory mechanism diverting income before accrual meant the claim of diversion by overriding title failed, and Article 289 did not exempt the receipts. The issue of disallowance of provision for leave encashment and pension contribution was not examined on merits and was sent back for fresh consideration after hearing the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 10:01:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1777 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189124</link>
      <description>A statutory corporation engaged in liquor trading remained taxable on income accrued in its own hands because the amounts described as privilege fee, special privilege fee and special privilege fee for sports were realised from sales and remitted only afterwards to the Government. The absence of a clear statutory mechanism diverting income before accrual meant the claim of diversion by overriding title failed, and Article 289 did not exempt the receipts. The issue of disallowance of provision for leave encashment and pension contribution was not examined on merits and was sent back for fresh consideration after hearing the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>