<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1628 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189134</link>
    <description>The appeal challenges the Tribunal&#039;s rejection of certain comparables for transfer pricing analysis. The Court upholds the rejection of one comparable due to lack of segmental information but questions the rejection of another due to corporate restructuring. The Court also dismisses the dispute over benchmarking methodology based on a previous decision. The judgment highlights the significance of functional similarity and correct benchmarking in transfer pricing assessments, admitting certain issues for further consideration while setting aside others.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 10:01:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1628 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189134</link>
      <description>The appeal challenges the Tribunal&#039;s rejection of certain comparables for transfer pricing analysis. The Court upholds the rejection of one comparable due to lack of segmental information but questions the rejection of another due to corporate restructuring. The Court also dismisses the dispute over benchmarking methodology based on a previous decision. The judgment highlights the significance of functional similarity and correct benchmarking in transfer pricing assessments, admitting certain issues for further consideration while setting aside others.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>