<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 791 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189122</link>
    <description>Exemption from urban land tax under Section 27 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Land Tax Act, 1966 is discretionary and depends on the Government being satisfied that payment would cause undue hardship. It requires a specific application supported by material and does not arise automatically from charitable status or recognition under the Income-tax Act. The distinction between Section 27, which is discretionary, and Section 29, which operates by force of statute, was emphasised. The trust&#039;s recognition under Section 12A(a) did not create a retrospective entitlement for the years in question, and the authorities could consider the government orders then in force. The exemption claim therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2016 18:00:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 791 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189122</link>
      <description>Exemption from urban land tax under Section 27 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Land Tax Act, 1966 is discretionary and depends on the Government being satisfied that payment would cause undue hardship. It requires a specific application supported by material and does not arise automatically from charitable status or recognition under the Income-tax Act. The distinction between Section 27, which is discretionary, and Section 29, which operates by force of statute, was emphasised. The trust&#039;s recognition under Section 12A(a) did not create a retrospective entitlement for the years in question, and the authorities could consider the government orders then in force. The exemption claim therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>