<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (4) TMI 27 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6246</link>
    <description>Profits from a snuff business continued by court-appointed receivers after dissolution proceedings were treated as income of an association of persons, not of the individual erstwhile partners. The receivers acted only as representatives of the real owners, and the business was carried on under court supervision for their benefit, with the owners acquiescing in that continuation by accepting periodic payments. For income-tax purposes, liability turns on the unit that earns the income, not on how the profits are later distributed. As the owners had joined in a common business purpose through their representatives, assessment in the character of an association of persons was proper.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 16:39:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (4) TMI 27 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6246</link>
      <description>Profits from a snuff business continued by court-appointed receivers after dissolution proceedings were treated as income of an association of persons, not of the individual erstwhile partners. The receivers acted only as representatives of the real owners, and the business was carried on under court supervision for their benefit, with the owners acquiescing in that continuation by accepting periodic payments. For income-tax purposes, liability turns on the unit that earns the income, not on how the profits are later distributed. As the owners had joined in a common business purpose through their representatives, assessment in the character of an association of persons was proper.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>