https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189110 Service rendered in the parent police cadre could be counted toward the recruitment rule for appointment as Superintendent of Police, because the rule required eight years in the relevant grade and did not confine experience to the Central Bureau of Investigation; regular appointment, not permanent absorption, was sufficient, so eligibility was upheld. Retrospective notional appointment from an earlier date was unjustified because the selection postponement had valid administrative reasons and no legal basis for an earlier deemed date was shown. Service in the Border Security Force was also countable for seniority from the date of regular promotion to an analogous post, so the seniority arrangements were set aside and fresh lists directed. en-us Fri, 09 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Dec 2016 15:07:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189110 Service rendered in the parent police cadre could be counted toward the recruitment rule for appointment as Superintendent of Police, because the rule required eight years in the relevant grade and did not confine experience to the Central Bureau of Investigation; regular appointment, not permanent absorption, was sufficient, so eligibility was upheld. Retrospective notional appointment from an earlier date was unjustified because the selection postponement had valid administrative reasons and no legal basis for an earlier deemed date was shown. Service in the Border Security Force was also countable for seniority from the date of regular promotion to an analogous post, so the seniority arrangements were set aside and fresh lists directed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 09 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189110