<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 1236 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189109</link>
    <description>Refund of duty on captively consumed copper cathode cuts was held not to be barred by unjust enrichment because the duty incidence was not passed on to buyers. The principle applies to captive consumption, but its operation depends on whether the burden has in fact been recovered. Where final product prices are fixed independently on ruling LME prices, the duty paid on the intermediate goods does not affect the sale price, so the refund claim remains maintainable. The lower appellate authority failed to address the material submission on LME-based pricing, and the refund had been credited to the Cenvat account on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2018 12:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 1236 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189109</link>
      <description>Refund of duty on captively consumed copper cathode cuts was held not to be barred by unjust enrichment because the duty incidence was not passed on to buyers. The principle applies to captive consumption, but its operation depends on whether the burden has in fact been recovered. Where final product prices are fixed independently on ruling LME prices, the duty paid on the intermediate goods does not affect the sale price, so the refund claim remains maintainable. The lower appellate authority failed to address the material submission on LME-based pricing, and the refund had been credited to the Cenvat account on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>