https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189097 The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the CESTAT order, noting the appeal was time-barred under Section 35(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The court allowed withdrawal of a subsequent Special Leave to Appeal with liberty to seek relief from the appropriate forum. It was clarified that the liberty granted was for filing an appeal against the CESTAT order, not for another writ petition. The court also held that filing a new writ petition on different grounds after a previous dismissal was inappropriate, leading to the dismissal of the petitioner's attempt to file another writ petition. en-us Mon, 11 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Feb 2017 14:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189097 The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the CESTAT order, noting the appeal was time-barred under Section 35(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The court allowed withdrawal of a subsequent Special Leave to Appeal with liberty to seek relief from the appropriate forum. It was clarified that the liberty granted was for filing an appeal against the CESTAT order, not for another writ petition. The court also held that filing a new writ petition on different grounds after a previous dismissal was inappropriate, leading to the dismissal of the petitioner's attempt to file another writ petition. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 11 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189097