<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1410 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336765</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for A.Y. 2005-06, ruling that the notice under Section 143(2) was not validly served, leading to the quashing of the assessment order. Consequently, other issues raised by the assessee, including the disallowance of interest payable to Mukand Limited, rates and taxes, and carry forward of business losses, were not adjudicated. The assessment order dated 29.11.2007 was declared void ab initio.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2016 09:40:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1410 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336765</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for A.Y. 2005-06, ruling that the notice under Section 143(2) was not validly served, leading to the quashing of the assessment order. Consequently, other issues raised by the assessee, including the disallowance of interest payable to Mukand Limited, rates and taxes, and carry forward of business losses, were not adjudicated. The assessment order dated 29.11.2007 was declared void ab initio.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>