<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1401 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336756</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the penalty imposed on the legal heir. The judgment emphasized the absence of deliberate concealment by the deceased or the legal heir, questioning the basis for penalty imposition solely on the wife. The ITAT&#039;s decision focused on the lack of evidence connecting the deposits to the legal heirs and the absence of mens rea, leading to the penalty&#039;s deletion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2016 09:24:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1401 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336756</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the penalty imposed on the legal heir. The judgment emphasized the absence of deliberate concealment by the deceased or the legal heir, questioning the basis for penalty imposition solely on the wife. The ITAT&#039;s decision focused on the lack of evidence connecting the deposits to the legal heirs and the absence of mens rea, leading to the penalty&#039;s deletion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>