<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1393 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336748</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the rectification application, correcting the mistake in the final order by amending the CENVAT Credit amount from Rs. 1,44,76,395 to the actual amount of Rs. 34,86,722. Despite the Revenue&#039;s argument of delay, the Tribunal found the application timely filed considering the delayed delivery of the order to the applicant. The rectification was deemed necessary and valid, resulting in the accurate amount being reflected in the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 11:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1393 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336748</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the rectification application, correcting the mistake in the final order by amending the CENVAT Credit amount from Rs. 1,44,76,395 to the actual amount of Rs. 34,86,722. Despite the Revenue&#039;s argument of delay, the Tribunal found the application timely filed considering the delayed delivery of the order to the applicant. The rectification was deemed necessary and valid, resulting in the accurate amount being reflected in the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>