<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1389 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336744</link>
    <description>A short delay in filing an appeal may be condoned where it is not deliberate or intentional and the explanation shows sufficient cause. Here, the absence of the authorised signatory abroad and the inability to attest the appeal papers in time were accepted as a valid explanation, and a liberal approach was applied because the right of appeal is substantive and should not be defeated by a narrow technical view within the condonable period. The delay was condoned, and the matter was remitted for decision on merits after hearing and production of documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2016 08:41:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1389 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336744</link>
      <description>A short delay in filing an appeal may be condoned where it is not deliberate or intentional and the explanation shows sufficient cause. Here, the absence of the authorised signatory abroad and the inability to attest the appeal papers in time were accepted as a valid explanation, and a liberal approach was applied because the right of appeal is substantive and should not be defeated by a narrow technical view within the condonable period. The delay was condoned, and the matter was remitted for decision on merits after hearing and production of documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>