<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1385 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336740</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of M/s. Emco Ltd., concluding that for the period after 1/7/2000, only the factory premises could be considered the place of removal, and thus, the freight and insurance charges were not to be included in the assessable value. For the period prior to 1/7/2000, the Tribunal initially considered the buyer&#039;s premises as the place of removal but later, following a remand and precedent, determined that the buyer&#039;s premises could not be the place of removal. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the charges should not be included in the assessable value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2016 07:39:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1385 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336740</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of M/s. Emco Ltd., concluding that for the period after 1/7/2000, only the factory premises could be considered the place of removal, and thus, the freight and insurance charges were not to be included in the assessable value. For the period prior to 1/7/2000, the Tribunal initially considered the buyer&#039;s premises as the place of removal but later, following a remand and precedent, determined that the buyer&#039;s premises could not be the place of removal. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the charges should not be included in the assessable value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>