<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1382 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336737</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the department&#039;s denial of exemption for goods including Climbers and Thriller Range under Notification No. 06/2002-CE. It held that playground equipment used for children&#039;s play in gardens qualified as sports goods, supported by the Bureau of Indian Standards classification and previous dropped demands for the appellant. The goods were deemed correctly classifiable as sports goods, entitling them to the exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 18:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1382 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336737</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the department&#039;s denial of exemption for goods including Climbers and Thriller Range under Notification No. 06/2002-CE. It held that playground equipment used for children&#039;s play in gardens qualified as sports goods, supported by the Bureau of Indian Standards classification and previous dropped demands for the appellant. The goods were deemed correctly classifiable as sports goods, entitling them to the exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336737</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>