<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1381 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336736</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by modifying the redemption fine and penalty, setting aside the confiscation of plants and machinery. The decision emphasized upholding the law while ensuring fairness and proportionality in penalties imposed, acknowledging the diversion of goods from their intended destination but reducing the penalties to achieve justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 14:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1381 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336736</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by modifying the redemption fine and penalty, setting aside the confiscation of plants and machinery. The decision emphasized upholding the law while ensuring fairness and proportionality in penalties imposed, acknowledging the diversion of goods from their intended destination but reducing the penalties to achieve justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>