<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1377 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336732</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, holding that Cenvat credit on structural steel is admissible for the period prior to 7/7/2009. The impugned order was modified accordingly, and the appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the consistent view of various High Courts that Cenvat credit on structural steel is admissible, thereby distinguishing the Larger Bench decision in Vandana Global Ltd.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2016 07:32:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1377 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336732</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, holding that Cenvat credit on structural steel is admissible for the period prior to 7/7/2009. The impugned order was modified accordingly, and the appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the consistent view of various High Courts that Cenvat credit on structural steel is admissible, thereby distinguishing the Larger Bench decision in Vandana Global Ltd.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336732</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>