<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1375 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336730</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that Cenvat credit on structural steel is admissible based on various High Court judgments, overruling the decision in Vandana Global Ltd. The Tribunal did not address the limitation aspect as the credit was found admissible on merit. Consequently, the impugned order was modified, and the appeal by the assessee was allowed. (Order Pronounced on 04/07/2016)</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2016 07:26:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1375 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336730</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that Cenvat credit on structural steel is admissible based on various High Court judgments, overruling the decision in Vandana Global Ltd. The Tribunal did not address the limitation aspect as the credit was found admissible on merit. Consequently, the impugned order was modified, and the appeal by the assessee was allowed. (Order Pronounced on 04/07/2016)</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>