https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336722 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, allowing the refund claims based on the argument that logs were cut for transportation, leading to discrepancies between the packing list and sales invoices. Citing previous judgments, the tribunal held that the appellants were entitled to the refund, overturning the previous rejection orders. The appeals were allowed, granting consequential reliefs to the appellants. en-us Fri, 28 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Dec 2016 13:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336722 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, allowing the refund claims based on the argument that logs were cut for transportation, leading to discrepancies between the packing list and sales invoices. Citing previous judgments, the tribunal held that the appellants were entitled to the refund, overturning the previous rejection orders. The appeals were allowed, granting consequential reliefs to the appellants. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 28 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336722