<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1349 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336704</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, and the appeal of the Revenue was dismissed. The Tribunal set aside the penalty proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer due to non-application of mind and the issuance of an incorrect notice. The Tribunal did not address the merits of the arguments regarding Explanation 5A and the voluntariness of the income offer due to the preliminary issue&#039;s resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2016 19:03:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1349 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336704</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, and the appeal of the Revenue was dismissed. The Tribunal set aside the penalty proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer due to non-application of mind and the issuance of an incorrect notice. The Tribunal did not address the merits of the arguments regarding Explanation 5A and the voluntariness of the income offer due to the preliminary issue&#039;s resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>