<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1348 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336703</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the PCIT&#039;s order and restoring the AO&#039;s decision. The Tribunal emphasized that the advances were given out of commercial expediency and thus rightly claimed as deductions, invalidating the PCIT&#039;s revisionary action under Section 263.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2016 19:03:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453136" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1348 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336703</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the PCIT&#039;s order and restoring the AO&#039;s decision. The Tribunal emphasized that the advances were given out of commercial expediency and thus rightly claimed as deductions, invalidating the PCIT&#039;s revisionary action under Section 263.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>