<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1345 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336700</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the disallowance of repairs and maintenance expenses treated as capital expenditure for the assessment year 2010-11. The Tribunal held that the expenses were current repairs under section 30 of the Income Tax Act and should not be treated as capital expenditure, contrary to the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision. Adjustments were directed regarding the depreciation allowed by the Revenue, favoring the assessee in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2016 19:03:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1345 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336700</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the disallowance of repairs and maintenance expenses treated as capital expenditure for the assessment year 2010-11. The Tribunal held that the expenses were current repairs under section 30 of the Income Tax Act and should not be treated as capital expenditure, contrary to the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision. Adjustments were directed regarding the depreciation allowed by the Revenue, favoring the assessee in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>