<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax Treatment Clarified: Transponder Payments Not Both &#039;Royalty&#039; and &#039;Fees for Technical Services&#039; u/s 195.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=32564</link>
    <description>TDS u/s 195 - availing transponder facility - CIT (A) cannot hold that same payment would fall in the nature of ‘royalty’ and at same time would be reckoned as ‘FTS’ also. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2016 19:02:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2016 19:02:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax Treatment Clarified: Transponder Payments Not Both &#039;Royalty&#039; and &#039;Fees for Technical Services&#039; u/s 195.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=32564</link>
      <description>TDS u/s 195 - availing transponder facility - CIT (A) cannot hold that same payment would fall in the nature of ‘royalty’ and at same time would be reckoned as ‘FTS’ also. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2016 19:02:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=32564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>