<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1339 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336694</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the unintentional nature of the omission, the voluntary disclosure of income, and the absence of deliberate concealment. The judgment underscored the significance of considering the appellant&#039;s actions in good faith and in compliance with tax obligations, leading to the allowance of the appeal against the penalty levy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2016 19:02:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453125" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1339 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336694</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the unintentional nature of the omission, the voluntary disclosure of income, and the absence of deliberate concealment. The judgment underscored the significance of considering the appellant&#039;s actions in good faith and in compliance with tax obligations, leading to the allowance of the appeal against the penalty levy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>