<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1337 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336692</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the original authority for a fresh examination of the refund claim. The decision emphasized the importance of considering all submitted documents and ensuring adherence to procedural requirements in refund matters. The appellant was granted an opportunity to present further evidence, highlighting the need for a fair evaluation process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2016 18:35:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1337 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336692</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the original authority for a fresh examination of the refund claim. The decision emphasized the importance of considering all submitted documents and ensuring adherence to procedural requirements in refund matters. The appellant was granted an opportunity to present further evidence, highlighting the need for a fair evaluation process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>