<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1336 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336691</link>
    <description>Refund of service tax on telecommunication services used by a SEZ unit for authorised operations was held admissible under Notification No. 9/2009-ST. The Tribunal applied prior precedent recognising credit for landline and mobile telephone services when used for business purposes, and treated the telecommunication service as covered by the refund mechanism. On that basis, the denial of refund was found unsustainable and the claim was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2016 18:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1336 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336691</link>
      <description>Refund of service tax on telecommunication services used by a SEZ unit for authorised operations was held admissible under Notification No. 9/2009-ST. The Tribunal applied prior precedent recognising credit for landline and mobile telephone services when used for business purposes, and treated the telecommunication service as covered by the refund mechanism. On that basis, the denial of refund was found unsustainable and the claim was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>