<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1331 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336686</link>
    <description>The appeal challenged penalties imposed under Sections 77 &amp;amp; 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, for non-payment of Service Tax. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalties. The appellant&#039;s immediate payment of Service Tax upon notification by the Department, without protest, was deemed a valid reason for not issuing a show-cause notice, leading to the conclusion that no penalties should be imposed. The Tribunal considered the confusion surrounding the taxability of &#039;Construction of Residential Complex Services&#039; and found the appellant had demonstrated reasonable cause for the delay in payment, ultimately allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2016 18:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1331 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336686</link>
      <description>The appeal challenged penalties imposed under Sections 77 &amp;amp; 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, for non-payment of Service Tax. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalties. The appellant&#039;s immediate payment of Service Tax upon notification by the Department, without protest, was deemed a valid reason for not issuing a show-cause notice, leading to the conclusion that no penalties should be imposed. The Tribunal considered the confusion surrounding the taxability of &#039;Construction of Residential Complex Services&#039; and found the appellant had demonstrated reasonable cause for the delay in payment, ultimately allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336686</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>